The Montessori Education System and the Desire to Learn

In Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paulo Freire discusses what he calls the financial arrangement of schooling. In the financial framework the understudy is viewed as an item in which the educator should put data. The understudy has no duty regarding perception of any kind; the understudy should just retain or disguise what the educator advises that person. Paulo Freire was a lot of contradicted to the financial framework. He contended that the financial framework is an arrangement of control and not a framework intended to effectively instruct. In the financial framework the instructor is intended to shape and change the conduct of the understudies, some of the time in a way that nearly takes after a battle. The educator attempts to drive data down the understudy’s throat that the understudy may not accept or think often about.

This cycle at last leads most understudies to hate school. It likewise drives them to build up an opposition and an antagonistic disposition towards learning as a rule, to where the vast majority won’t look for information except if it is needed for an evaluation in a class. Freire believed that the best way to have genuine training, wherein the understudies take part in discernment, was to transform from the financial framework into what he characterized as issue presenting instruction. Freire portrayed how an issue presenting instructive framework could work in Pedagogy of the Oppressed by saying, “Understudies, as they are progressively presented with issues identifying with themselves on the planet and with the world, will feel progressively tested and obliged to react to that challenge. Since they secure the test as interrelated to different issues inside a complete setting not as a hypothetical inquiry, the subsequent understanding will in general be progressively basic and in this way continually less alienated”(81). The instructive framework created by the Italian doctor and teacher Maria Montessori presents a tried and successful type of issue presenting training that drives its understudies to build their craving to learn instead of repressing it.

Freire gives two significant issues the financial idea. The first is that in the financial idea an understudy isn’t needed to be intellectually dynamic. The understudy is intended to just remember and rehash data, not to get it. This restrains the understudies’ imagination, devastates their premium in the subject, and changes them into detached students who don’t comprehend or accept what they are being instructed however acknowledge and rehash it since they have no other choice. The second and more sensational outcome of the financial idea is that it gives a colossal capacity to the individuals who pick what is being instructed to mistreat the individuals who are obliged to learn it and acknowledge it. Freire clarifies that the issues lies in that the instructor holds all the keys, has all the appropriate responses and does all the reasoning. The Montessori way to deal with instruction does the specific inverse. It causes understudies to do all the reasoning and critical thinking with the goal that they come to their own end results. The instructors just assistance control the understudy, however they don’t mention to the understudy what is valid or bogus or how an issue can be addressed.

In the Montessori framework, regardless of whether an understudy figures out how to tackle a difficult that is more slow or less powerful than a standard mechanical method of taking care of the issue, the educator won’t intercede with the understudy’s cycle since this way the understudy figures out how to discover arrangements without help from anyone else or herself and to consider imaginative approaches to chip away at various issues.

The instructive framework in the United States, particularly from grade school to the furthest limit of secondary school, is practically indistinguishable from the financial way to deal with training that Freire portrayed. During secondary school the greater part of what understudies do is sit in a class and take notes. They are then evaluated on how well they complete schoolwork and projects lastly they are tried to show that they can replicate or utilize the information which was instructed. More often than not the understudies are just receptors of data and they take no part in the production of information. Another manner by which the U.S. training framework is essentially indistinguishable from the financial arrangement of schooling is the evaluating framework. The evaluations of understudies generally reflect the amount they consent to the instructor’s thoughts and the amount they are happy to follow headings. Evaluations reflect accommodation to power and the ability to do what is told more than they mirror one’s knowledge, interest in the class, or comprehension of the material that is being instructed. For example, in an administration class in the United States an understudy who disagrees that a delegate majority rule government is better than some other type of government will do more regrettable than an understudy who just acknowledges that an agent majority rule government is superior to an immediate vote based system, communism, socialism, or another type of social framework. The U.S. schooling framework remunerates the individuals who concur with what is being instructed and rebuffs the individuals who don’t.

Moreover, it deters understudies from addressing and doing any thinking about their own. In view of the monotonous and lifeless nature of our schooling framework, most understudies detest secondary school, and in the event that they excel on their work, it is only to get an evaluation instead of learning or investigating a groundbreaking thought.

The Montessori Method advocates kid based instructing, letting the understudies assume responsibility for their own schooling. In E.M Standing’s The Montessori Revolution in Education, Standing says that the Montessori Method “is a technique dependent on the guideline of opportunity in a readied environment”(5). Studies done on two gatherings of understudies of the ages of 6 and 12 looking at the individuals who learn in a Montessori to the individuals who learn in a standard school climate show that notwithstanding the Montessori framework having no evaluating framework and no mandatory outstanding task at hand, it does just as the standard framework in both English and sociologies; however Montessori understudies improve in arithmetic, sciences, and critical thinking. The Montessori framework takes into consideration understudies to have the option to investigate their inclinations and interest openly. In light of this the Montessori framework pushes understudies toward the dynamic quest for information for joy, implying that understudies will need to learn and will get some answers concerning things that premium them basically on the grounds that it is amusing to do as such.

Leave a Reply